The Systems Approach to International Development
The Systems Approach to International Development International development efforts aim to improve the lives and livelihoods of communities in developing…
Social entrepreneurship has become increasingly popular in recent years as more individuals seek to make a positive impact on society through their work. As a social entrepreneur, it is important to stay informed and up-to-date on the latest trends and best practices in the field. In this article, we present a comprehensive guide to the 20 articles every social entrepreneur should read
In this book, John Elkington explores the role of social entrepreneurs in driving positive change and the qualities that set them apart from traditional entrepreneurs. He argues that social entrepreneurs are “unreasonable” in the sense that they tackle problems that others see as unsolvable and strive to create a better world.
In this Stanford Social Innovation Review article, Roger L. Martin & Sally Osberg argue for a clear definition of social entrepreneurship. They define social entrepreneurship as a “way of thinking and acting that seeks to create social value in innovative and sustainable ways”. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the field and sets the foundation for further exploration.
This Stanford Social Innovation Review article discusses the mindset and approach of successful social entrepreneurs, who strive to create positive social change while also achieving financial sustainability. The author take inspiration from social entrepreneur Priya Karim Haji and argues that social entrepreneurs approach problems and opportunities with a “yes” mentality, embracing uncertainty and risk and finding creative solutions. They focus on identifying and solving societal problems, rather than just maximizing profits, and are willing to work tirelessly to make a lasting impact. The article highlights the importance of persistence, passion, and a strong vision in driving success for social entrepreneurs.
In this Stanford Social Innovation Review article, Amanda Levinson & Natasha Freidus argue how, despite their success, the funding landscape for social innovation is deeply flawed, as investors often question why they are a for-profit company, instead of a nonprofit. Additionally, few funding mechanisms exist for early-stage impact companies and grants are nearly nonexistent.
The authors also highlight the effects of gender and racial bias in the investment landscape, where only 2 percent of all investable assets went to impact companies, and only 2 percent of all VC funding went to women. They describe their own struggles to secure investment, despite their progress, and their disillusionment with pitch competitions and events sponsored by corporations who use these events for free marketing exposure.
Sasha Dichter, Chief Innovation Officer of Acumen, shares his insights on how social entrepreneurs can scale their impact in this book. He offers practical advice on how to measure and maximize impact, and the importance of building strong partnerships and networks.
This Stanford Social Innovation Review article is about the limitations of philanthropy in terms of government spending and its impact on social innovation. The authors argues that while philanthropy is important, it cannot substitute government funding and that it is often difficult to transfer successful programs from philanthropy to government funding. The authors suggests using the pay for success (PFS) model as a way to encourage government uptake of innovative solutions.
They introduced a new version of PFS called the “outcomes amplifier” model, where instead of repaying the private philanthropist, the government commits to funding future rounds of the project, providing a way for philanthropists to achieve sustained social impact and easier implementation for governments. The author used an example of a project in Singapore where this model was used to support income stability for families in need.
In this Harvard Business Review article, Charles Leadbeater examines the growing trend of social entrepreneurship and its impact on traditional business models. He argues that social entrepreneurs are changing the way we think about business and creating a new paradigm for economic and social value.
In this Harvard Business Review article, Roger L. Martin explores the challenges faced by social entrepreneurs in balancing their desire for social impact with their need for financial sustainability. He offers practical advice on how to navigate this dilemma and the importance of finding a balance that works for the individual entrepreneur and their organization.
In this Stanford Social Innovation Review article, Ashoka founder Bill Drayton shares his insights on building a successful social entrepreneurship movement. He highlights the importance of creating a supportive ecosystem that fosters innovation, collaboration, and the sharing of ideas and resources among social entrepreneurs.
According to Drayton, this includes providing training and mentorship opportunities, as well as establishing networks and partnerships that bring together a diverse range of stakeholders, including government, business, and non-profit organizations.
The concept of social entrepreneurship gained widespread recognition in 2003 when a group of nonprofit leaders were invited to attend the inaugural session on social entrepreneurship at the World Economic Forum in Davos. Since then, the idea has been embraced by businesses, governments, and nonprofits worldwide, leading to the emergence of socially responsible business models and an increased need for leaders who can drive innovation in this direction.
Unlike traditional businesses, companies that aim to both generate profits and have a positive impact have distinct considerations when starting out. If you aspire to establish a for-profit social enterprise, here are six crucial questions to reflect upon.
A cautionary tale for those who allow ego and elitism to influence their social and business judgment. Black’s letter to a young social entrepreneur highlights that forming a group of idolized and nearly unparalleled individuals results in unintended consequences and questionable choices. The letter evoked passionate responses from the worldwide community of social innovators.
The “one-for-one” business model, where a donation is made for each product sold, has been adopted by companies producing products ranging from shoes to eyeglasses. But does this approach truly benefit those in need, or is it potentially harmful?
The abundance of small startups in the field of social entrepreneurship raises the concern of fragmented efforts that fail to bring substantial change. However, this risk can be mitigated by embracing three strategies that enable even the smallest social enterprise to make a significant impact.
While a business that prioritizes the betterment of society may have the upper hand morally, what happens when viewed purely from a business perspective? Will venture capitalists prioritize a business with a social mission over one with a slightly higher level of profitability? Although there is growth in the social impact investment arena, if this does not become a widespread practice, how will social enterprise have the scale to bring about global change?
The distinction between “social” and “commercial” entrepreneurship, as portrayed by the term “social entrepreneurship,” may have served a purpose in the past by clarifying the type of entrepreneurial endeavor being referred to. However, today, it only contributes to a further division between entrepreneurial practices. Duncan contends that this artificial separation between “profit” and “good deeds” is precisely what is wrong with capitalism.
The term “disruptive innovation” is frequently used loosely and its original meaning has been lost. The same fate may befall the current buzzword “social entrepreneurship.” Has it already deviated from its original definition?
In today’s society, the desire to be a “social entrepreneur” has become prevalent. However, this fixation on entrepreneurship and the idea of the “heroic founder” perpetuates a false hierarchy in education, funding, awards, and media. To truly drive positive social change, it is important to shift the focus from promoting individual entrepreneurs to promoting overall impact on society. This report aims to guide individuals, educators, and funders towards this goal.
Maximizing impact for social enterprises requires effectively engaging their target audience, which can be challenging with increased competition for consumer attention. Here are four strategies for ensuring your social impact stands out.
A rising trend of social enterprises, established to address societal and environmental issues, has emerged in recent years. However, the question remains, how can these philanthropic businesses maintain themselves in the long run? To uncover the key to sustainability, SmartCompany reached out to successful social enterprise founders and industry specialists, who shared their top four strategies for running a viable social enterprise.
Social entrepreneurship is a rapidly growing field that offers a unique blend of business acumen and social impact. As a social entrepreneur, staying informed and up-to-date with the latest trends and best practices is crucial to your success. The 20 articles mentioned in this blog post provide a comprehensive overview of the key issues and challenges that social entrepreneurs face and offer valuable insights on how to overcome them. Whether you’re just starting out or have been in the game for a while, these articles are a must-read for anyone looking to make a positive impact on the world through their business.
The Systems Approach to International Development International development efforts aim to improve the lives and livelihoods of communities in developing…
Accelerating Change and Achieving the SDGs, How Collaborations with Social Entrepreneurs Help Social entrepreneurs are a driving force in bringing…
Uncovering the Top African Social Enterprises That Had People Talking in 2022 Africa is a continent of great potential and…
Load More
